Ockenden Maternity Review | Independent review of maternity care at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust

Topic group chairs

PDF, 27.5KB, 2 pages

Introduction to peer review

Peer review is a fundamental part of the research lifecycle. Using your ORCID iD to enable connections with the organizations for which you perform reviews raises the visibility of your efforts and contributions. This is why ORCID has worked with members of the community to develop ways to recognize resource use and enable you to share that information with publishers, funders, and research organizations.

The peer review section of your ORCID record recognizes individual contributions that you have made to other organizations. These contributions can include evaluation of journal articles and books, as well as conference programs, grant award applications, and hiring, promotion, and tenure decisions. Unlike other sections of the ORCID record, reviews are automatically aggregated together based on a group identifier, usually for the organization or publication which organized the review. In addition, like works, “Other IDs” (person IDs), and grants, individual reviews are automatically grouped together based on a shared review identifier.

ORCID supports a range of review activities, from double blind reviews, which provide minimum information about a review, to open reviews, which if wished can point directly to the review report and the work that was reviewed.

Peer reviews can only be added to your ORCID record by a trusted organization. This can be done by the organizer of the review or evaluation, such as a publisher, society, funder, or research institution, or it can be done by a third-party review recognition service, such as Web of Science, which works with review organizers to recognize your reviews. In both cases, in order for your ORCID record to be updated, you will need to verify your iD by signing into ORCID, and grant the review organizer or third-party recognition review permission to update your ORCID record with information about your review contribution.

About the Review 

In October 2002 DHSSPS initiated a major, wide-ranging and independent review of the law, policy and provision affecting people with mental health needs or a learning disability in Northern Ireland.  The Review follows similar exercises in England and Scotland.

The Reviews was overseen by a Steering Committee comprising representatives from professional and other interested groups in the mental health and learning disability fields, under the Chairmanship of Professor David Bamford of the University of Ulster. Professor Roy McClelland of Queen’s University, Belfast, was the Deputy Chair.

A-B

Australia - 2022

Austria  - 2019

Argentina -   2019

Belgium - 2016

Failure to file acknowledgment of service

54.9

(1) Where a person served with the claim form has failed to file an acknowledgment of service in accordance with rule 54.8, he –

(a) may not take part in a hearing to decide whether permission should be given unless the court allows him to do so; but

(b) provided he complies with rule 54.14 or any other direction of the court regarding the filing and service of –

(i) detailed grounds for contesting the claim or supporting it on additional grounds; and

(ii) any written evidence,

may take part in the hearing of the judicial review.

(2) Where that person takes part in the hearing of the judicial review, the court may take his failure to file an acknowledgment of service into account when deciding what order to make about costs.

(3) Rule 8.4 does not apply.

Back to top

Footnotes

1. 1981 c.54. Back to text
2. 1990 c. 8. Back to text
3. 1981 c.54. Section 31 is amended by section 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (c. 15). Back to text

Strategic Framework Goals and High Level Objectives 

Informed by these values and principles, the service review provides a unique opportunity to address the full spectrum of issues relating to mental ill-health and learning disability. The Review goes beyond specific mental health problems or individual groupings, to include, for example, mental health promotion, public health measures to reduce mental ill-health and suicide, and the challenges of stigma. In responding to the needs of individual service users and their carers, there is a need for clear specification of models and standards.

To ensure a balanced and inclusive framework, the following high level objectives have been set:

1. recommend specific reforms of service for each of the following user groups – children, young people, men and women with mental health needs or a learning disability; [Service reforms will specify models of care and standards of provision in relation to the quality, comprehensiveness, effectiveness, accessibility and acceptability of provision. They will include detailed consideration of primary and secondary care services, the interface between these services, the linkages and interfaces between health and social care, education, culture arts and leisure, employment and housing, the complementary roles of statutory and non-statutory services, and the issues surrounding multi-disciplinary and multi-agency working];
2. review the strategy for mental health promotion, embracing public health measures to reduce mental ill health and suicide;
3. review of the law;
4. review of relevant legislation and other requirements relating to human rights, equality of opportunity and social inclusion of people with mental health needs or learning disability and their carers;
5. review of the Mental Health Order (NI) 1986; and
6. make recommendations regarding future legislation to reflect the needs of users and carers in the context of the framework values and principles.

• All proposals will be evidence-based, noting the quality of evidence presently available. 

Questions on the local plan review

If you have any questions about the local plan review, email blp@bristol.gov.uk.

The Peer review section of your ORCID record is for information about your individual peer review contributions. The organization for which you are carrying out the peer review or evaluation will typically request your iD during the review submission process, as well as asking for permission to update your ORCID record after you complete the review. Like research resources and person identifiers, peer reviews can only be added to your ORCID record by a trusted organization, with your explicit permission – you cannot manually add them to your record yourself.

The peer review section will not appear on your personal (private) ORCID record until a trusted organization has added a review to your ORCID record. You must make the review activity visible to everyone in order for it to also display on your public ORCID record.

For recording information about serving as a peer reviewer for a journal, conference, faculty, or more, please use the Service affiliation.

1. Introduction to peer review
2. Fields in a peer review activity

Thirty days before Annual Review date

Thirty days before the review date, CMS begins the process of calculating the amount of child maintenance due for the next 12 months.

It will:

• contact HMRC to find out the latest available gross income for the paying parent and also check whether they are getting any benefits
• work out the weekly amount of child maintenance
• write to both parents to let them know the amount of child maintenance due from the Annual Review date, the figures used and how it was calculated   

If either parent disagrees with any of the figures used to calculate the child maintenance or has information they think could change it, they have up to the date of the Annual Review to contact CMS.

If a change is made because of the information provided by either parent, CMS will backdate the change to the date of the Annual Review decision.

Scope of the Review

The Review will take into account recent policy and other developments here and in the European Union, and address how best to provide services to people with specific mental health needs or a learning disability in accordance with the statutory equality obligations of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, with the Human Rights Act 1998, and to promote their social inclusion.

Equally, the Review will address how to promote positive mental health in society, analysing the relevance of key concepts such as community education, prevention and the promotion of mental health awareness.  The Review will undertake research to facilitate its work and will seek out exemplars of best practice which are available regionally, nationally and internationally.

The Review will also cover the role and function of the Mental Health Commission and the Mental Health Review Tribunal, and relevant social issues including education, employment, housing, and social security benefits. It will work in partnership with the Northern Ireland Office and criminal justice agencies to review therapeutic intervention with offenders who have psychiatric difficulties. Issues relating to incapacity will also be addressed.