National case review repository

Main menu

• Home
• Topics
• Publications
• Consultations
• Contact

Get in touch

Due to current restrictions, we are not running any invited reviews at this time. If you would like to contact us about future reviews, please contact invited.reviews@rcpch.ac.uk.

Claim form

54.29

(1) In addition to the matters set out in rule 8.2 (contents of the claim form) the claimant must also state—

(a)the name of the public authority, the defendant, against whom the claim for environmental review is brought;

(b)the name and address of any person the claimant considers to be an interested party; and

(c)any remedy (including any interim remedy) sought by the claimant.

(2) The claim form must be accompanied by the documents required by Practice Direction 54E.

Applications and Referrals under the Act

The Tribunal also has responsibility to consider applications and referrals relating to authorisations of deprivation of liberty and to the appointment or removal of nominated persons under Parts 2 and 3 of the Act.  The Tribunal has the discretion to conduct hearings under the Act either orally or on the papers, where the panel reach their decision on the evidence alone.

In accordance with Chapter 7 of Part 2 of the Act, in relation to an authorisation under Schedules 1 and 2, the Tribunal must revoke the authorisation; or take no action in respect of the authorisation.

The Act also provides the Tribunal with a range of powers and procedures in respect of the appointment or removal of nominated persons. The Tribunal’s Deprivation of Liberty guide for applicants and their nominated person provides additional explanatory information on the process

Step 2

How can we improve this page? *

Would you use our information again or recommend it to a friend? Yes No *

Please choose the option that best describes you

I have asthma

I look after a child with asthma

I have a friend or family member with asthma

I'm a professional working with people with asthma

Other (Please state)

Please state what best describes you *

Step 1/2

"Neurosurgical Review" provides a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to five reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, "Neurosurgical Review" combines the topicality of professional journals with the in-depth treatment of a monograph. Case reports will generally not be accepted for publication.

• Publishes papers dealing with clinical neurosurgery
• 27 days from submission of manuscript to first decision
• All manuscripts checked for plagiarism

How the review will be carried out and how you can make representations

Before making any recommendations or publishing final proposals, the council must consult local government electors for the area under review and any other person or body (including a local authority) which appears to the council to have an interest in the Review.

The council will therefore:

• publish a Notice and Terms of Reference
• send a copy of the Notice and these Terms of Reference to all parish clerks and to the Dorset Association of Town and Parish Councils
• send a copy of the Notice and these Terms of Reference to all local Members of Parliament
• inform local groups and interested parties such as local businesses, local residents’ associations, local public and voluntary organisations such as schools or health bodies

The council recognises that the development of strong, sustainable communities depends on residents’ active participation in decision making in respect of the governance arrangements of parish councils, and the Council is therefore committed to engaging effectively with the diverse communities it serves and to enabling local people to participate meaningfully in the creation of effective community governance arrangements where all people feel able to take an active part in influencing service delivery.

The timetable below sets out dates for 2 periods of public consultation. The first period of public consultation, based on the Community Governance Review consultation paper, ended on 28 October 2021 and you can view the initial submissions/representations received.  A report of draft recommendations was considered by Full Council at its meeting on 15 February 2022. The second period of public consultation, on the draft recommendations as agreed by Full Council at its meeting on 15 February 2022, ended on 23 May 2022 and you can view the submissions/representations received.  A report of final recommendations was considered and approved by Full Council at its meeting on 14 July 2022.  View the minutes of the meeting.

Privacy notice

You can download our privacy notice below - this explains how we use data and information on our reviews

Ações

Após revisar um pagamento, você pode removê-lo da fila de análises com uma destas opções:

• Aprovar: encerra a análise sem alterações feitas ao pagamento. Você ainda pode reembolsar (ou reembolsar e reportar fraude) qualquer pagamento aprovado a qualquer momento.
• Reembolsar: reembolsa o pagamento sem denunciar a fraude à Stripe. O reembolso é definitivo e não pode ser desfeito. Será preciso processar um novo pagamento.
• Reembolsar e reportar fraude: reembolsa o pagamento e também denuncia a fraude à Stripe. Com isso, o cartão e o e-mail são inseridos em suas listas de bloqueio e nossa prevenção contra fraudes.

Se um cliente contestar um pagamento que está em sua fila de análises, a análise é encerrada automaticamente.

Thirty days before Annual Review date

Thirty days before the review date, CMS begins the process of calculating the amount of child maintenance due for the next 12 months.

It will:

• contact HMRC to find out the latest available gross income for the paying parent and also check whether they are getting any benefits
• work out the weekly amount of child maintenance
• write to both parents to let them know the amount of child maintenance due from the Annual Review date, the figures used and how it was calculated   

If either parent disagrees with any of the figures used to calculate the child maintenance or has information they think could change it, they have up to the date of the Annual Review to contact CMS.

If a change is made because of the information provided by either parent, CMS will backdate the change to the date of the Annual Review decision.

What happens if my appeal is dismissed?

Judicial decisions of the Tribunal may only be challenged in such circumstances by way of Judicial Review to the High Court.  If you wish to pursue a legal challenge you should seek timely legal advice on the matter.

Latest issue

BIS Quarterly Review, September 2022 

Market swings reflected investors' evolving perception of the outlook for inflation and monetary policy during the period under review.

Main menu

• Home
• Topics
• Publications
• Consultations
• Contact

Background to the Connaught review

The FCA Board committed to a review in 2016, following the Complaints Commissioner’s recommendation. This followed the investigation of a complaint made by a whistleblower who provided intelligence on the Connaught Fund.

The start of the review was deferred until it would no longer prejudice any enforcement investigations.

The independent review considered the proportionality, appropriateness and effectiveness of the actions taken by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and later the FCA when supervising Tiuta, Capita and Blue Gate. It looked at the regulators’ approach to and response to intelligence, plus the FCA’s approach to and involvement in the mediated negotiations before the launch of enforcement investigations in March 2015.

Contact details

MHActReview@dh.gsi.gov.uk

Contents

Most water and sewerage services in England and Wales are not provided in competitive markets. Most people receive their water services from a licensed monopoly company. Only business customers are able to choose their supplier.

Because competition is limited, there is a risk that these companies will not deliver the services their customers want. They may also charge higher prices to increase their profits. This is why they need to be regulated. And it is why Ofwat was created when the water and sewerage sectors were privatised in 1989.

One of the ways we regulate is to set the price, investment and service package that customers receive. This includes controlling prices companies can charge their customers. When we do this, we have a duty to balance consumers’ interests with the need to ensure the sectors are also able to finance the delivery of water and sewerage services. We also need to ensure sure they are able to meet their other legal obligations, including their environmental and social duties.

We currently carry out a review of these price limits every five years. We carried out an additional review of the non-household retail price control in 2016.

We are currently working on the price review for 2024 (PR24). This will set wholesale price controls for water and sewerage companies for 2025 to 2030.

We intend to consult on the way we set price controls by published our draft methodology in July 2022, and will set final price limits in December 2024.

Read more about price reviews here.