Welcome to the Criminal Cases Review Commission

Relevant Forms

Mental Capacity Act (Northern Ireland) 2016 - Deprivation of Liberty

• Review Tribunal Form 1 - Application to appeal a Deprivation of Liberty by P
• Review Tribunal Form 2 – Application to appeal a Deprivation of Liberty by Nominated Person
• Review Tribunal Form 3 - Application for Appointment of Nominated Person
• Review Tribunal Form 4 - Application for Revocation of Appointment of Nominated Person where P regains capacity

Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986

• Review Tribunal Form 5 – Application by Detained Patient
• Review Tribunal Form 6 - Application by Restricted Patient
• Review Tribunal Form 7 – Application by Patient under Guardianship
• Review Tribunal Form 8 - Application by Nearest Relative

Low risk

Where the RPA for a programme or project is designated low risk and where this is agreed by the DAC, an internal peer review should be undertaken. This should be in line with gateway principles and conducted by an independent team appointed by the department.

It is important to note that an internal peer review is not a gateway review and an IPR team must not be described as having carried out a gateway review under these circumstances.

Further information on the gateway review process is available from the departmental assurance co-ordinator in the Centre of Expertise for Programme and Project Management.

Read other people's reviews

The reviews and ratings you see in Google Maps were added by other users.

Tip: The date on a review is the date it was published.

1. On your Android phone or tablet, open the Google Maps app .
2. Search for a place or tap it on the map.
3. At the bottom, tap the place's name or address.
4. At the top, tap Reviews.

To read reviews in another language:

1. On your Google Account, go to your languages settings.
2. On the right, tap Edit and select a language.
3. Reload Google Maps and check the review again.

Tip: To find high-quality reviews, look for Local Guide . This icon means the review is from a Local Guide.

Seeing your GP or asthma nurse at other times

You don't need to wait for your asthma review to see your GP or asthma nurse about your asthma. If you're worried about anything, you can make an appointment at any time.

Using an asthma action plan makes it easier to know when you need to see your GP or asthma nurse.

2020 - 2023 Peer Reviews Timetable

Peer reviews are a unique opportunity for governments to learn from others and review the practices of their NCPs through a systematic process. They are voluntary, but in recognition of their importance, at the June 2017 OECD Ministerial Council Meeting (MCM), governments committed “to having fully functioning and adequately resourced National Contact Points, and to undertake a peer learning, capacity building exercise or a peer review by 2021, with a view to having all countries peer-reviewed by 2023.”

·

Related Documents

Health advice > Managing your asthma

Find out what happens at an asthma review and get top tips on how to get the best out of your appointment.

Mission Statement

The Review will adopt an inclusive and transparent approach, and will have an inherently multi-disciplinary ethos. Consumer expertise, both in terms of users and carers, will be seen as a core value and a means by which the Review can test out its ongoing work and proposals.

This independent Review will strive to promote equality of opportunity and good relations between people of different religious belief; political opinion, racial group, age, marital status, or sexual orientation, between men and women generally, between persons with a disability and persons without, and between persons with dependents and persons without. The Review will be conducted in the context of respect for persons, a commitment to the self-realisation of people, social inclusion, and full citizenship for all.

Our Mission is to grasp this opportunity and ensure that the set of recommendations we present to Government chart the course for the 21st Century

Information about the reviewer

• Role (required): The individual’s role in the review process, e.g. chair, editor, member, organizer, reviewer
• Identifier (required): The reviewer’s ORCID iD

Topic group chairs

PDF, 27.5KB, 2 pages

Transfer

54.20 The court may

(a) order a claim to continue as if it had not been started under this Section; and

(b) where it does so, give directions about the future management of the claim.

(Part 30 (transfer) applies to transfers to and from the Administrative Court)

Back to top

Time limit for filing claim form

54.28

(1) The claim form must be filed not later than 6 months from the date by which a response to a decision notice was required under section 36(3) of the Environment Act 2021.

(2) The time limit in paragraph (1) may be extended, but only upon application to the court by the claimant and if the court is satisfied that it is reasonable to do so.

3 Reasons Why AskGamblers Is the Best Online Casino Website

With a long-standing tradition of 15 years for being the most reputable and trustworthy online gambling platform, AskGamblers has become a name very few people in the gambling industry don't know. However, if there were only three things to single out, a quick rundown of those would be:

Cochrane Review Groups

The Cochrane Reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews are prepared by authors who register titles with one of the Cochrane Review Groups. Each Cochrane Review Group focuses on a specific topic area and is led by a Co-ordinating Editor(s) and an editorial team, including a Managing Editor and an Information Specialist. The Cochrane Review Groups provide authors with methodological and editorial support to prepare Cochrane Reviews, and manage the editorial process, including peer review.

All Co-ordinating Editors and other Cochrane Review Group staff and editors have made declarations of conflicts of interest.

Government departments and agencies rely on models for their day-to-day activities including estimating costs; distributing funding within organisations; and testing policy options. They routinely develop and use models to generate insight into a question or to better understand a problem related to their business. These models can vary in complexity from relatively simple spreadsheets to detailed forecasts using specialist software. Outputs from models underpin decisions made by departments and arm’s-length bodies that often have very real impacts on people’s lives and can involve large amounts of money and resources.

In our audit work across government, we continue to find weaknesses in models such as:

• limited or poor-quality data;
• unrealistic assumptions and optimism bias; and
• inadequate sensitivity and scenario analysis.

The framework provides a structured approach to review models, which organisations can use to determine whether the modelling outputs they produce are reasonable, robust and have a minimal likelihood of errors being made.