Examination Reviews

Exibição detalhada

Local Plan review consultation 2019

We held a consultation on the local plan from March to May 2019.

• pdfThe local plan's draft policies(7.83 MB)
• pdfThe draft site allocations(6.68 MB)
• pdfThe proposals for protection of open space(11.84 MB)
• pdfSustainability Appraisal Scoping Report(1.66 MB)

Here's a summary of the responses we received to the latest consultation:

pdfSummary of responses to the March 2019 consultation(2.19 MB)

Your comments have been taken into account and are informing the next stages of developing the new local plan.

document(70 KB)

Court's powers to hear any person

54.17

(1) Any person may apply for permission –

(a) to file evidence; or

(b) make representations at the hearing of the judicial review.

(2) An application under paragraph (1) should be made promptly.

Back to top

Where claimant seeks to rely on additional grounds

54.15 The court’s permission is required if a claimant seeks to rely on grounds other than those for which he has been given permission to proceed.

Back to top

The Connaught review

Raj Parker conducted the review of the FCA’s handling of the Connaught Income Fund Series 1 and connected companies which was published on 17 December 2020.

Have your say

All interested parties are welcome to submit their views by Sunday 7 August 2022.

Views can be submitted by email to kerslakereview@lambeth.gov.uk.

If you wish to submit views in writing please address them to:

Kerslake ReviewLambeth CouncilP.O. Box 734WinchesterSO23 5DG

The BIS Quarterly Review examines developments in international banking and financial markets.  Published in March, June, September and December, it comprises a review of market developments over the past quarter, and special features that analyse topical economic and financial issues.

Strategic Framework Vision 

The vision behind this strategic framework is to give a real and meaningful priority to the challenges of mental health and learning disability, embracing a reduction in the incidence and prevalence, a reduction in mortality and in the extent and severity of problems associated with mental ill-health and learning disability. Central to the vision is a valuing of people with mental health needs or a learning disability, their rights to full citizenship, equality of opportunity and self-determination. It anticipates a process of reform, renewal and modernisation of services.

The strategic framework embraces the complementary challenges of mental health and learning disability. It also recognises the requirement for:

• a balanced response to the need for better services for people with mental health and learning disability;
• a clear framework to promote positive mental health and reduce stigma. 

Community Governance Review (CGR)

A Community Governance Review is a process whereby East Suffolk Council can make changes to the governance arrangements for town and parish councils and parish areas.

The process involves asking the public and other interested parties about the most suitable way of representing the local communities.  This is to ensure that local governance arrangements within East Suffolk continue to be reflective of the identity and interest of local communities and that they are as efficient and effective as they can be.

Community Governance Reviews are undertaken in accordance with the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007.  This enables East Suffolk Council to review parish governance systems and structures.  A number of changes can be made when there is clear evidence to do so:

• Changes to parish areas.  This includes changes to parish boundaries, the merging of two or more parishes, creating a new parish out of part of one or more existing parishes.
• Changes to electoral arrangements.  This includes changing the number of parish councillors and introducing or changing parish warding arrangements.
• Changes to the name of a parish.  (this can also be undertaken through a process under S75 of Local Government Act 1972).
• Changes to parish grouping arrangements.  This involves the grouping together of parishes under a common parish council.

It is good practice to carry out a Community Governance Review every 10-15 years.  However, East Suffolk Council may schedule a review in response of a reasonable request from an individual, group or parish or following the receipt of a valid petition containing the sufficient number of signatures required.

For more information on the review process, please read the Government guidance Community governance reviews: guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) or email CGR@eastsuffolk.gov.uk.

Terms of reference

Partners

Skip to Contact footer navigation

• Sutton Trust
• Impetus
• Department for Education
• What Works Network

I JUDICIAL REVIEW

NHS access standards review

The NHS National Medical Director was asked by the Prime Minister in June 2018, to review the core set of NHS access standards, in the context of the model of service described in the NHS Long Term Plan, and informed by the latest clinical and operational evidence, recommend any required updates and improvements to ensure that NHS standards:

• promote safety and outcomes;
• drive improvements in patients experience;
• are clinically meaningful, accurate and practically achievable;
• ensure the sickest and most urgent patients are given priority;
• ensure patients get the right service in the right place;
• are simple and easy to understand for patients and the public; and
• not worsen inequalities.

The review is being undertaken in three phases:

1. Consider what is already known about how current targets operate and influence behaviour
2. Map the current standards against the NHS Long Term Plan to examine how performance measures can help transform the health service and deliver better care and treatment
3. Test and evaluate proposals to ensure that they deliver the expected change in behaviour and experience for patients prior to making final recommendations for wider implementation

To support this work a Clinical Advisory Group has been established, which includes members from the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the Royal Colleges of Surgeons, Physicians, Nursing and Emergency Medicine, Healthwatch, and senior members of NHS England and NHS Improvement clinical teams. The group input into each phase of the review.

Footnotes

1. 1981 c.54. Back to text
2. 1990 c. 8. Back to text
3. 1981 c.54. Section 31 is amended by section 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (c. 15). Back to text

Information about the organizer

• Convening organization (required): This describes the organization which organized the review - a journal publisher, conference organizer, funding agency, faculty, etc.
• City (required): The city where the organizer is based
• Region: The region where the organizer is based
• Country (required): The country where the organizer is based
• Identifier (required): The persistent identifier for the organization

Interim report - 1 May 2018

This is a summary of the review’s work so far. Easy Read and British Sign Language versions are also available

Phase 1 Report: Insights to Develop Further

The Phase 1 report reflects the views of more than 100 organisations and many individuals. It is published alongside an updated analysis of the financial sustainability of colleges and universities; a the findings of a review of Regional Strategic Bodies; an international benchmarking study; and an overview of the context that supports the Phase 1 report.

• Coherence and Sustainability: A review of Scotland’s Colleges and Universities Phase One Report: Insights to Develop Further [PDF]
• The Financial Sustainability of Colleges and Universities in Scotland – Review Report [PDF]
• Review of Regional Strategic Bodies – Overview Report [PDF]
• Review of Regional Strategic Bodies – Glasgow Colleges’ Regional Board [PDF]
• Review of Regional Strategic Bodies – Lanarkshire Board [PDF]
• Review of Regional Strategic Bodies - University of the Highlands and Islands [PDF]
• International Benchmarking by Delivery Associates [PDF]
• Context to support the Review of Coherent Provision and Sustainability – Phase 1 Report [PDF]
• Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework [PDF]